Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited
Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limited operates in Asset Management Company, part of the Financial Services sector. It booked ₹122 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) and kept 48.7% of sales as profit. It is the 7th largest of 9 Asset Management Company companies we track, by market value.
“is to Net-to-Gross, redemptions, and recent classification and implementation of further scale our digital business by transaction activity (last five controls and tools to secure sensitive building more integrated, intelligent, transactions), helping teams drive information.”
Healthier than 73% of companies in Financial Services, on the 4 of 6 measures we could read for it. Each measure is ranked against the 55–253 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 48
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
Not measurable for this company: balance sheet, growth & consistency. Those pillars are left out of the score rather than counted as zero.
What if I invest in CRAMC?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-11-04.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹122 cr |
| Other Income | ₹7 cr |
| Total Income | ₹128 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹0 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹29 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹66 L |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹2 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹16 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹48 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹80 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹21 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹59 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 46.2% |
| Metric | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 114 cr | 116 cr | 122 cr |
| Total income | 104 cr | 146 cr | 128 cr |
| Expenses | 46 cr | 46 cr | 48 cr |
| Profit before tax | 58 cr | 99 cr | 80 cr |
| Tax | 17 cr | 24 cr | 21 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 41 cr | 76 cr | 59 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 36.2% | 65.1% | 48.7% |
| EPS (₹) | 2.07 | 3.79 | 2.97 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Prudential Asset Management Company Limited | ₹2,872 | ₹1.42 L cr | 39.9 | 66.6% | 53.1% | — |
| HDFC Asset Management Company Limited | ₹2,440 | ₹1.05 L cr | 34.9 | 34.8% | 64.0% | — |
| SBI Funds Management Limited | ₹482 | ₹98,246 cr | 35.1 | 37.1% | 58.8% | — |
| Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited | ₹984 | ₹62,980 cr | 48.5 | 27.2% | 40.8% | — |
| Aditya Birla Sun Life AMC Limited | ₹812 | ₹23,489 cr | 26.6 | 22.8% | 45.7% | — |
| UTI Asset Management Company Limited | ₹802 | ₹10,303 cr | 19.5 | 12.0% | 31.9% | — |
| Canara Robeco Asset Management Company Limitedthis company | ₹217 | ₹4,335 cr | 18.3 | 28.3% | 48.7% | — |
| Gaja Alternative Asset Management Limited | ₹128 | ₹365 cr | 3.4 | — | 171.5% | — |
| IL&FS Investment Managers Limited | ₹8 | ₹250 cr | 33.2 | 4.2% | 24.5% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 16 Oct 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹2.5 / share | 16 Jul 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹1.5 / share | 22 Dec 2025 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.