Tasty Bite Eatables Limited
Tasty Bite Eatables Limited operates in Packaged Foods, part of the Fast Moving Consumer Goods sector. It booked ₹156 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 5.7% of sales as profit.
“Emerging Trends Tasty Bite Eatables Ltd. (TBEL), founded in 1985 and with Aggregator-led expansion of delivery its headquarters near Pune, India, is a leading supplier of ecosystems and the rise of speed-focused quick ready-to-eat Asian and Indian cuisine, sauces, and frozen commerce are reshaping competition, with food products.”
Healthier than 62% of companies in Fast Moving Consumer Goods, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 89–149 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 52
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in TASTYBITE?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 15%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹156 cr |
| Other Income | ₹6 cr |
| Total Income | ₹162 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹101 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-5 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹15 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹96.6 L |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹8 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹30 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹150 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹12 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹3 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹9 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 5.5% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 177 cr | 118 cr | 156 cr |
| Total income | 184 cr | 124 cr | 162 cr |
| Expenses | 160 cr | 116 cr | 150 cr |
| Profit before tax | 23 cr | 8 cr | 12 cr |
| Tax | 6 cr | 2 cr | 3 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 17 cr | 6 cr | 9 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 9.9% | 5.1% | 5.7% |
| EPS (₹) | 68.14 | 23.41 | 34.45 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nestle India Limited | ₹1,371 | ₹2.64 L cr | 68.9 | 74.4% | 15.0% | — |
| Britannia Industries Limited | ₹4,982 | ₹1.20 L cr | 50.7 | 46.3% | 11.8% | — |
| The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited | ₹1,399 | ₹19,738 cr | 8.5 | 16.4% | 5.7% | — |
| Zydus Wellness Limited | ₹546 | ₹17,368 cr | 36.5 | 8.2% | 8.3% | — |
| Bikaji Foods International Limited | ₹553 | ₹13,857 cr | 57.6 | 15.0% | 8.2% | — |
| Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Limited | ₹221 | ₹6,772 cr | 43.8 | 12.2% | 7.1% | — |
| Gopal Snacks Limited | ₹252 | ₹3,145 cr | 61.2 | 10.7% | 3.0% | — |
| ADF Foods Limited | ₹268 | ₹2,942 cr | 42.6 | 12.1% | 10.3% | — |
| Prataap Snacks Limited | ₹1,100 | ₹2,581 cr | 30.4 | 12.8% | 5.6% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹10 / share | 6 Aug 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 1 Aug 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 1 Aug 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 14 Jul 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹1 / share | 25 Aug 2022 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 15 Jul 2021 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.