Autoline Industries Limited
Autoline Industries Limited operates in Auto Components & Equipments, part of the Consumer Discretionary sector. It booked ₹265 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 0.6% of sales as profit.
Healthier than 45% of companies in Consumer Discretionary, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 187–421 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 37
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold
What if I invest in AUTOIND?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹265 cr |
| Other Income | ₹1 cr |
| Total Income | ₹267 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹171 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹15 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹17 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹12 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹7 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹43 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹265 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹2 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹0 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹2 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 0.7% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 209 cr | 289 cr | 265 cr |
| Total income | 210 cr | 292 cr | 267 cr |
| Expenses | 205 cr | 277 cr | 265 cr |
| Profit before tax | 5 cr | 30 cr | 2 cr |
| Tax | 7 L | 4 L | 0 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 5 cr | 30 cr | 2 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 2.5% | 10.5% | 0.6% |
| EPS (₹) | 1.07 | 6.70 | 0.41 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samvardhana Motherson International Limited | ₹162 | ₹1.71 L cr | 41.3 | 10.1% | 2.9% | — |
| Bosch Limited | ₹47,735 | ₹1.41 L cr | 49.8 | 19.0% | 12.1% | — |
| Bharat Forge Limited | ₹1,919 | ₹91,740 cr | — | -3.8% | -1.9% | — |
| UNO Minda Limited | ₹1,205 | ₹69,583 cr | 58.8 | 17.3% | 5.3% | — |
| Schaeffler India Limited | ₹3,991 | ₹62,379 cr | 48.0 | 21.2% | 11.8% | — |
| Tube Investments of India Limited | ₹2,599 | ₹50,313 cr | 74.6 | 8.7% | 2.7% | — |
| Sona BLW Precision Forgings Limited | ₹778 | ₹48,388 cr | 67.1 | 12.1% | 13.8% | — |
| Endurance Technologies Limited | ₹2,691 | ₹37,849 cr | 38.7 | 14.3% | 5.7% | — |
| Exide Industries Limited | ₹419 | ₹35,581 cr | 25.4 | 10.1% | 6.3% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹1 / share | 19 Sep 2013 |
| Dividend | ₹4 / share | 5 Sep 2012 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 26 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.
When a company raises money from investors, it has to say up front what the money is for. The rules then make it report, every three months until the money is gone, how much of each of those things it has actually paid for — so a promise made while asking for the money can be checked afterwards.
As of Mar 2026, the company says it has spent 25% of what it set aside.
The rupee amounts in this company’s own breakdown don’t add up to the amount it says it raised — a common filing slip, where a table meant to be read in lakhs is entered as whole rupees. Rather than guess which is right, we show only the percentages, which are unaffected.
As of Jun 2025, the company says it has spent 58% of what it set aside.
“The Company had already received 25 % of the Warrant Issue money aggregating Rs. 5.64 Crores on allotment of Warrants as on January 01, 2024 and utilized the money for Capex, Working Capital and and General Corporate Purposes as follows: The Company has received balance amount i.e. 75% of Issue price of warrants in the month of June 2025, within a period of 18 months, pursuant to the preferential issue of warrants made on January 1, 2024, the utilisation of aforesaid balance amount has varied from the originally stated objects as given in the explanatory statement to the notice for general meeting. This variation has arisen due to changes in market dynamics, infusion of funds to the stated objects from other sources on account of business demand, and change in operational priorities since the original objects were determined 18 months prior. Certain planned expenditures/requirements were optimized and resulting in lesser requirement of Capex in current situation, while new strategic opportunities requiring funding in operations emerged. The variation in the utilisation of funds is in the best interest of the Company, will enhance operational efficiency, and is expected to improve shareholder value.”the company’s own explanation, as filed
The rupee amounts in this company’s own breakdown don’t add up to the amount it says it raised — a common filing slip, where a table meant to be read in lakhs is entered as whole rupees. Rather than guess which is right, we show only the percentages, which are unaffected.
Every figure above is taken from the statement the company files with the stock exchange each quarter, for as long as money it has raised remains unspent. The only thing we work out is how much of each stated purpose has been paid for — one number divided by another from the same filing. Whether a plan that changed was a good change is not something a filing can tell you. See the filing