CEAT Limited
CEAT Limited operates in Tyres & Rubber Products, part of the Automobile and Auto Components sector. It booked ₹4,762 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) and kept 0.5% of sales as profit. It is the 4th largest of 8 Tyres & Rubber Products companies we track, by market value.
“A US$ 5.2 billion diversified global conglomerate, RPG Group was founded in 1979 by the legendary industrialist Dr Corporate Overview R.P. Goenka and has a lineage dating to the early 19th century. Today, its businesses span key sectors of Industry About the Report 2 infrastructure, tyres, IT & technology, pharmaceuticals, energy products and plantations among others, with a footprint in over 135 countries.”
Healthier than 45% of companies in Automobile and Auto Components, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 14–52 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 56
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in CEATLTD?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-11-04.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹4,762 cr |
| Other Income | ₹5 cr |
| Total Income | ₹4,767 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹3,234 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹66 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-185 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹321 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹87 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹193 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹869 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹4,585 cr |
| Exceptional Items | ₹-13 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹169 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹52 cr |
| Share of JV / Associates | ₹-5 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹112 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 2.3% |
| Metric | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 4,219 cr | 4,318 cr | 4,762 cr |
| Total income | 4,245 cr | 4,324 cr | 4,767 cr |
| Expenses | 3,895 cr | 4,285 cr | 4,585 cr |
| Profit before tax | 340 cr | 32 cr | 169 cr |
| Tax | 101 cr | 33 cr | 52 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 244 cr | 4 cr | 26 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 5.8% | 0.1% | 0.5% |
| EPS (₹) | 60.45 | 1.07 | 27.79 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRF Limited | ₹1,17,690 | ₹49,901 cr | 25.2 | 9.4% | 5.9% | — |
| Balkrishna Industries Limited | ₹2,191 | ₹42,342 cr | 23.5 | 22.9% | 18.2% | — |
| Apollo Tyres Limited | ₹396 | ₹25,169 cr | 17.9 | 8.3% | 4.7% | — |
| CEAT Limitedthis company | ₹3,331 | ₹13,324 cr | 30.0 | 2.1% | 0.5% | — |
| JK Tyre & Industries Limited | ₹325 | ₹9,373 cr | 35.5 | 4.3% | 1.3% | — |
| TVS Srichakra Limited | ₹4,175 | ₹3,198 cr | 23.5 | 11.4% | 3.2% | — |
| Tolins Tyres Limited | ₹82 | ₹324 cr | 13.1 | 6.9% | 7.8% | — |
| Modi Rubber Limited | ₹115 | ₹289 cr | 17.0 | 2.5% | 54.3% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹35 / share | 31 Jul 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹30 / share | 8 Aug 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹30 / share | 9 Aug 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹12 / share | 20 Jun 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹3 / share | 10 Jun 2022 |
| Dividend | ₹18 / share | 27 Aug 2021 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 14 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.
When a company raises money from investors, it has to say up front what the money is for. The rules then make it report, every three months until the money is gone, how much of each of those things it has actually paid for — so a promise made while asking for the money can be checked afterwards.
The company has not broken this money down into purposes in its filing for Dec 2025, so there is nothing to measure it against yet.
Every figure above is taken from the statement the company files with the stock exchange each quarter, for as long as money it has raised remains unspent. The only thing we work out is how much of each stated purpose has been paid for — one number divided by another from the same filing. Whether a plan that changed was a good change is not something a filing can tell you. See the filing