EPL Limited
EPL Limited operates in Packaging, part of the Capital Goods sector. It booked ₹1,388 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 7.1% of sales as profit. It is the largest of 9 Packaging companies we track, by market value.
| Segment | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMESA | 991 | 1,226 | 1,369 | 1,419 | 1,469 | 1,544 | 31% → 30% |
| AMERICAS | 501 | 572 | 876 | 989 | 1,110 | 1,345 | 16% → 26% |
| EAP | 782 | 863 | 850 | 936 | 1,004 | 1,161 | 24% → 23% |
| EUROPE | 769 | 748 | 844 | 893 | 989 | 1,092 | 24% → 21% |
| AMERCIAS | 151 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AMERICS | — | 164 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 3,194 | 3,573 | 3,938 | 4,236 | 4,572 | 5,142 |
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
“To be the most sustainable packaging Market leader in revenue growth.”
“To be the most sustainable packaging Market leader in revenue growth.”
Healthier than 47% of companies in Capital Goods, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 19–127 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 46
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold
What if I invest in EPL?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 15%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-11-03.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹1,388 cr |
| Other Income | ₹4 cr |
| Total Income | ₹1,392 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹611 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-48 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹280 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹29 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹109 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹284 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹1,265 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹126 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹28 cr |
| Share of JV / Associates | ₹3 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹101 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 7.2% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,149 cr | 1,301 cr | 1,388 cr |
| Total income | 1,163 cr | 1,310 cr | 1,392 cr |
| Expenses | 1,044 cr | 1,178 cr | 1,265 cr |
| Profit before tax | 108 cr | 116 cr | 126 cr |
| Tax | 24 cr | 12 cr | 28 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 82 cr | 103 cr | 99 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 7.1% | 7.9% | 7.1% |
| EPS (₹) | 2.55 | 3.22 | 3.08 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPL Limitedthis company | ₹225 | ₹7,213 cr | 18.3 | 13.8% | 7.1% | — |
| AGI Greenpac Limited | ₹632 | ₹4,087 cr | 15.4 | 10.5% | 10.1% | — |
| UFLEX Limited | ₹559 | ₹4,035 cr | 2.4 | 20.8% | 7.9% | — |
| TCPL Packaging Limited | ₹4,188 | ₹3,811 cr | 23.8 | 22.3% | 8.1% | — |
| Jindal Poly Films Limited | ₹700 | ₹3,065 cr | 8.8 | 14.2% | 15.5% | — |
| Polyplex Corporation Limited | ₹907 | ₹2,846 cr | 7.8 | 8.6% | 4.0% | — |
| Xpro India Limited | ₹997 | ₹2,339 cr | 73.7 | 4.2% | 4.6% | — |
| Knack Packaging Limited | ₹187 | ₹2,283 cr | 22.5 | 13.9% | 8.5% | — |
| COSMO FIRST LIMITED | ₹767 | ₹2,013 cr | 5.0 | 22.3% | 7.1% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹2.5 / share | 17 Nov 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹2.5 / share | 2 Sep 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹2.5 / share | 25 Nov 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹2.3 / share | 14 Aug 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹2.15 / share | 21 Nov 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹2.15 / share | 4 Aug 2023 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 8 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.