Garware Hi-Tech Films Limited
Garware Hi-Tech Films Limited operates in Plastic Products - Industrial, part of the Capital Goods sector. It booked ₹696 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) and kept 18.6% of sales as profit. It is the 3rd largest of 9 Plastic Products - Industrial companies we track, by market value.
Healthier than 75% of companies in Capital Goods, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 81–127 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 61
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in GRWRHITECH?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 15%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-11-04.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹696 cr |
| Other Income | ₹20 cr |
| Total Income | ₹715 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹295 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹20 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹51 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹3 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹13 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹160 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹542 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹173 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹44 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹129 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 18.1% |
| Metric | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 597 cr | 633 cr | 696 cr |
| Total income | 618 cr | 653 cr | 715 cr |
| Expenses | 475 cr | 476 cr | 542 cr |
| Profit before tax | 142 cr | 176 cr | 173 cr |
| Tax | 34 cr | 44 cr | 44 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 108 cr | 133 cr | 129 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 18.1% | 21.0% | 18.6% |
| EPS (₹) | 46.58 | 57.10 | 55.71 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supreme Industries Limited | ₹3,300 | ₹41,927 cr | 39.9 | 16.4% | 7.8% | — |
| Astral Limited | ₹1,388 | ₹37,343 cr | 77.6 | 11.8% | 7.6% | — |
| Garware Hi-Tech Films Limitedthis company | ₹7,396 | ₹17,180 cr | 33.2 | 17.8% | 18.6% | — |
| Kingfa Science & Technology (India) Limited | ₹6,737 | ₹9,130 cr | 28.5 | 22.9% | 11.6% | — |
| Finolex Industries Limited | ₹138 | ₹8,534 cr | 18.6 | 6.1% | 10.5% | — |
| Time Technoplast Limited | ₹167 | ₹8,218 cr | 17.7 | 11.4% | 6.9% | — |
| Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited | ₹276 | ₹3,050 cr | 16.0 | 11.1% | 5.8% | — |
| Apollo Pipes Limited | ₹513 | ₹2,261 cr | — | -4.2% | -2.9% | — |
| Jain Irrigation Systems Limited | ₹28 | ₹2,087 cr | — | -1.0% | -1.0% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹12 / share | 16 Sep 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹12 / share | 17 Sep 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹10 / share | 17 Sep 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹10 / share | 20 Sep 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹10 / share | 19 Sep 2022 |
| Dividend | ₹10 / share | 20 Sep 2021 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 17 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.