The Orissa Minerals Development Company Limited
The Orissa Minerals Development Company Limited operates in Industrial Minerals, part of the Commodities sector. It booked ₹29 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q4 FY26) and kept -26.2% of sales as profit. It is the 7th largest of 9 Industrial Minerals companies we track, by market value.
| Segment | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Ore | 3,553 | 8,188 | 6,460 | 9,410 | 86% → 100% |
| Tax Expenses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% → 0% |
| Manganese Ore | 0 | 40 | 1 | 0 | 0% → 0% |
| Sponge Iron | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% → 0% |
| Un allocated | 583 | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 4,137 | 8,228 | 6,462 | 9,410 |
From the company's standalone segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
Healthier than 28% of companies in Commodities, on the 5 of 6 measures we could read for it. Each measure is ranked against the 121–173 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 35
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs · lowest in its sector on what we could measure
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
Not measurable for this company: valuation. Those pillars are left out of the score rather than counted as zero.
What if I invest in ORISSAMINE?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹29 cr |
| Other Income | ₹2 cr |
| Total Income | ₹31 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹0 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-3 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹9 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹5 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹20.7 L |
| Other Expenses | ₹32 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹43 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹-12 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹-4 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹-8 cr |
| Net margin on total income | -24.2% |
The company made a net loss of ₹8 cr this quarter — income covered only ₹73 of every ₹100 it spent on costs and tax.
| Metric | Q2 FY26 | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 25 cr | 21 cr | 29 cr |
| Total income | 26 cr | 21 cr | 31 cr |
| Expenses | 23 cr | 15 cr | 43 cr |
| Profit before tax | 3 cr | 6 cr | -12 cr |
| Tax | 12.5 L | 2 cr | -4 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 3 cr | 4 cr | -8 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 12.5% | 21.1% | -26.2% |
| EPS (₹) | 5.24 | 7.24 | -12.68 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lloyds Metals And Energy Limited | ₹1,799 | ₹1.01 L cr | 14.7 | 49.8% | 23.5% | — |
| NMDC Limited | ₹81 | ₹71,038 cr | 9.0 | 23.2% | 29.1% | — |
| Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited | ₹549 | ₹17,463 cr | 26.7 | 9.2% | 18.0% | — |
| Gravita India Limited | ₹1,612 | ₹11,894 cr | 27.6 | 17.4% | 7.2% | — |
| MOIL Limited | ₹243 | ₹5,768 cr | 28.0 | — | 19.2% | — |
| Ashapura Minechem Limited | ₹518 | ₹4,946 cr | 10.7 | 28.0% | 7.1% | — |
| The Orissa Minerals Development Company Limitedthis company | ₹3,896 | ₹2,338 cr | — | — | -26.2% | — |
| 20 Microns Limited | ₹206 | ₹726 cr | 10.2 | 14.7% | 7.3% | — |
| Goa Carbon Limited | ₹378 | ₹346 cr | — | -15.6% | -10.0% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹1.46 / share | 7 Sep 2017 |
| Dividend | ₹2.66 / share | 16 Sep 2016 |
| Dividend | ₹4.43 / share | 14 Sep 2015 |
| Dividend | ₹1.04 / share | 12 Sep 2014 |
| Dividend | ₹3.22 / share | 10 Sep 2013 |
| Stock split | Stock Split From Rs.10/- to Rs.1/- | 29 Oct 2012 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.