Rashi Peripherals Limited
Rashi Peripherals Limited operates in Computers Hardware & Equipments, part of the Information Technology sector. It booked ₹5,102 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 2.0% of sales as profit. It is the 2nd largest of 9 Computers Hardware & Equipments companies we track, by market value.
“TRANSFORMING THE TECH LANDSCAPE Rashi Peripherals Limited offers a holistic approach to meet the diverse needs of our B2B customers. Since our inception in 1989, we have consistently grown our reach, brand portfolio, and locations to serve the diverse needs of our brand partners and channel partners by offering them value-added support.”
Healthier than 56% of companies in Information Technology, on the 5 of 6 measures we could read for it. Each measure is ranked against the 81–123 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 50
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
Not measurable for this company: growth & consistency. Those pillars are left out of the score rather than counted as zero.
What if I invest in RPTECH?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹5,102 cr |
| Other Income | ₹17 cr |
| Total Income | ₹5,119 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹0 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹5,604 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-759 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹57 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹27 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹6 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹45 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹4,980 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹139 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹34 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹105 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 2.0% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 4,030 cr | 4,489 cr | 5,102 cr |
| Total income | 4,043 cr | 4,505 cr | 5,119 cr |
| Expenses | 3,944 cr | 4,392 cr | 4,980 cr |
| Profit before tax | 99 cr | 114 cr | 139 cr |
| Tax | 24 cr | 27 cr | 34 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 74 cr | 84 cr | 103 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 1.8% | 1.9% | 2.0% |
| EPS (₹) | 11.16 | 12.78 | 15.59 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNG Electronics Limited | ₹662 | ₹7,543 cr | 65.1 | 15.3% | 7.0% | — |
| Rashi Peripherals Limitedthis company | ₹807 | ₹5,317 cr | 12.9 | 20.3% | 2.0% | — |
| Moschip Technologies Limited | ₹208 | ₹4,042 cr | 400.1 | 2.4% | 2.1% | — |
| NELCO Limited | ₹965 | ₹2,203 cr | 236.6 | 7.3% | 2.9% | — |
| D-Link (India) Limited | ₹425 | ₹1,508 cr | 13.6 | 21.8% | 6.0% | — |
| Ivalue Infosolutions Limited | ₹228 | ₹1,246 cr | 20.0 | 11.1% | 8.8% | — |
| Control Print Limited | ₹604 | ₹965 cr | 61.6 | 16.4% | 16.1% | — |
| TVS Electronics Limited | ₹404 | ₹753 cr | — | -27.6% | -6.2% | — |
| Dc Infotech And Communication Limited | ₹283 | ₹464 cr | 24.9 | 16.8% | 2.7% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 14 Aug 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 11 Aug 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹1 / share | 23 Aug 2024 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.
When a company raises money from investors, it has to say up front what the money is for. The rules then make it report, every three months until the money is gone, how much of each of those things it has actually paid for — so a promise made while asking for the money can be checked afterwards.
As of Jun 2026, the company says it has spent 100% of what it set aside. CARE Ratings Limited watches the spending on the exchange’s behalf.
The rupee amounts in this company’s own breakdown don’t add up to the amount it says it raised — a common filing slip, where a table meant to be read in lakhs is entered as whole rupees. Rather than guess which is right, we show only the percentages, which are unaffected.
Every figure above is taken from the statement the company files with the stock exchange each quarter, for as long as money it has raised remains unspent. The only thing we work out is how much of each stated purpose has been paid for — one number divided by another from the same filing. Whether a plan that changed was a good change is not something a filing can tell you. See the filing