UCAL LIMITED
UCAL LIMITED operates in Auto Components & Equipments, part of the Consumer Discretionary sector. It booked ₹203 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 2.9% of sales as profit.
“Across six decades, UCAL has been ranked among the leading manufacturers of Fuel Management Systems and automotive components in India and overseas markets, reputed for its innovation, engineering expertise and superior quality products.”
Healthier than 62% of companies in Consumer Discretionary, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 301–421 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 49
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash · highest in its sector on what we could measure
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in UCAL?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 0%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹203 cr |
| Other Income | ₹2 cr |
| Total Income | ₹205 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹111 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹9 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-2 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹21 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹7 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹6 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹45 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹197 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹8 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹2 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹6 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 2.8% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 199 cr | 233 cr | 203 cr |
| Total income | 200 cr | 235 cr | 205 cr |
| Expenses | 208 cr | 231 cr | 197 cr |
| Profit before tax | -11 cr | -11 cr | 8 cr |
| Tax | -83.7 L | 2 cr | 2 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | -10 cr | -13 cr | 6 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | -4.9% | -5.6% | 2.9% |
| EPS (₹) | -4.38 | -5.95 | 2.64 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samvardhana Motherson International Limited | ₹162 | ₹1.71 L cr | 41.3 | 10.1% | 2.9% | — |
| Bosch Limited | ₹47,735 | ₹1.41 L cr | 49.8 | 19.0% | 12.1% | — |
| Bharat Forge Limited | ₹1,919 | ₹91,740 cr | — | -3.8% | -1.9% | — |
| UNO Minda Limited | ₹1,205 | ₹69,583 cr | 58.8 | 17.3% | 5.3% | — |
| Schaeffler India Limited | ₹3,991 | ₹62,379 cr | 48.0 | 21.2% | 11.8% | — |
| Tube Investments of India Limited | ₹2,599 | ₹50,313 cr | 74.6 | 8.7% | 2.7% | — |
| Sona BLW Precision Forgings Limited | ₹778 | ₹48,388 cr | 67.1 | 12.1% | 13.8% | — |
| Endurance Technologies Limited | ₹2,691 | ₹37,849 cr | 38.7 | 14.3% | 5.7% | — |
| Exide Industries Limited | ₹419 | ₹35,581 cr | 25.4 | 10.1% | 6.3% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 22 Sep 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 19 Aug 2022 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 22 Sep 2021 |
| Dividend | ₹9 / share | 19 Sep 2019 |
| Dividend | ₹10 / share | 19 Sep 2018 |
| Dividend | ₹5 / share | 20 Sep 2017 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 12 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.