ATLANTAA LIMITED
ATLANTAA LIMITED operates in Road Assets–Toll, Annuity, Hybrid-Annuity, part of the Services sector. It booked ₹18 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept -27.6% of sales as profit. It is the 4th largest of 7 Road Assets–Toll, Annuity, Hybrid-Annuity companies we track, by market value.
Healthier than 30% of companies in Services, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 75–116 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 40
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in ATLANTAA?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹18 cr |
| Other Income | ₹4 cr |
| Total Income | ₹22 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹7 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹2 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹3 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹10 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹6 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹28 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹-5 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹-33.3 L |
| Net Profit | ₹-5 cr |
| Net margin on total income | -22.8% |
The company made a net loss of ₹5 cr this quarter — income covered only ₹80 of every ₹100 it spent on costs and tax.
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 17 cr | 31 cr | 18 cr |
| Total income | 23 cr | 35 cr | 22 cr |
| Expenses | 24 cr | 7 cr | 28 cr |
| Profit before tax | -1 cr | 28 cr | -5 cr |
| Tax | -26 L | 6 cr | -33.3 L |
| Net profit (owners' share) | -79.7 L | 22 cr | -5 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | -4.8% | 70.8% | -27.6% |
| EPS (₹) | -0.10 | 2.65 | -0.62 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF Utilities Limited | ₹521 | ₹4,845 cr | 11.8 | 55.3% | 17.7% | — |
| Innovision Limited | ₹254 | ₹657 cr | — | -9.6% | -2.7% | — |
| Highway Infrastructure Limited | ₹43 | ₹309 cr | 67.3 | 1.9% | 0.3% | — |
| ATLANTAA LIMITEDthis company | ₹36 | ₹295 cr | — | -9.5% | -27.6% | — |
| Noida Toll Bridge Company Limited | ₹4 | ₹74 cr | 3.4 | — | 46.5% | — |
| Gayatri Highways Limited | ₹2 | ₹45 cr | — | — | -39.9% | — |
| MEP Infrastructure Developers Limited | ₹1 | ₹12 cr | — | — | -623.0% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹0.3 / share | 19 Sep 2018 |
| Dividend | ₹0.3 / share | 21 Jul 2017 |
| Dividend | ₹0.3 / share | 18 Sep 2015 |
| Dividend | ₹0.24 / share | 31 Jul 2014 |
| Dividend | ₹0.2 / share | 20 Sep 2012 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 16 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.