Ceigall India Limited
Ceigall India Limited operates in Civil Construction, part of the Industrials sector. It booked ₹970 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 6.3% of sales as profit.
| Segment | FY25 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering, Procurement and Construction | 3,166 | 3,389 | 74% → 84% |
| Annuity Projects | 780 | 1,471 | 18% → 37% |
| Others | 334 | 498 | 8% → 12% |
| Eliminations | — | -1,335 | -33% |
| Total | 4,280 | 4,022 |
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
Healthier than 47% of companies in Industrials, on the 5 of 6 measures we could read for it. Each measure is ranked against the 51–290 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 81
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold
Not measurable for this company: growth & consistency. Those pillars are left out of the score rather than counted as zero.
What if I invest in CEIGALL?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹970 cr |
| Other Income | ₹11 cr |
| Total Income | ₹981 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹236 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹1 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-1 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹11 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹44 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹13 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹579 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹883 cr |
| Exceptional Items | ₹-3 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹95 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹32 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹64 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 6.5% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 991 cr | 1,387 cr | 970 cr |
| Total income | 1,002 cr | 1,399 cr | 981 cr |
| Expenses | 905 cr | 1,223 cr | 883 cr |
| Profit before tax | 97 cr | 176 cr | 95 cr |
| Tax | 25 cr | 47 cr | 32 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 74 cr | 127 cr | 61 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 7.5% | 9.1% | 6.3% |
| EPS (₹) | 4.16 | 7.41 | 3.66 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larsen & Toubro Limited | ₹3,836 | ₹5.28 L cr | 32.0 | 15.1% | 6.1% | — |
| Rail Vikas Nigam Limited | ₹202 | ₹42,055 cr | 66.3 | 6.5% | 3.7% | — |
| Kalpataru Projects International Limited | ₹1,399 | ₹23,900 cr | 19.3 | 15.9% | 4.8% | — |
| IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited | ₹19 | ₹22,767 cr | 18.9 | 5.8% | 14.3% | — |
| NBCC (India) Limited | ₹82 | ₹22,175 cr | 36.0 | 20.5% | 6.9% | — |
| Cemindia Projects Limited | ₹1,255 | ₹21,563 cr | 38.3 | 23.5% | 5.2% | — |
| Engineers India Limited | ₹264 | ₹14,824 cr | 23.5 | 20.1% | 19.3% | — |
| Techno Electric & Engineering Company Limited | ₹985 | ₹11,452 cr | 30.7 | 9.0% | 14.8% | — |
| KEC International Limited | ₹402 | ₹10,700 cr | 36.8 | 4.7% | 1.4% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹0.5 / share | 11 Sep 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹0.5 / share | 23 Sep 2024 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 27 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.
When a company raises money from investors, it has to say up front what the money is for. The rules then make it report, every three months until the money is gone, how much of each of those things it has actually paid for — so a promise made while asking for the money can be checked afterwards.
As of Mar 2026, the company says it has spent 100% of what it set aside, leaving ₹6.5 L still to be spent. ICRA LIMITED watches the spending on the exchange’s behalf.
Every figure above is taken from the statement the company files with the stock exchange each quarter, for as long as money it has raised remains unspent. The only thing we work out is how much of each stated purpose has been paid for — one number divided by another from the same filing. Whether a plan that changed was a good change is not something a filing can tell you. See the filing