Larsen & Toubro Limited
Larsen & Toubro Limited operates in Civil Construction, part of the Construction sector. It booked ₹67,942 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 6.1% of sales as profit. It is the largest of 9 Civil Construction companies we track, by market value.
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
Healthier than 61% of companies in Construction, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 19–23 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 36
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in LT?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹67,942 cr |
| Other Income | ₹2,377 cr |
| Total Income | ₹70,318 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹20,959 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹427 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-1,791 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹14,043 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹539 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹1,032 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹28,187 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹63,396 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹6,922 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹1,939 cr |
| Share of JV / Associates | ₹5 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹4,988 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 7.1% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 71,450 cr | 82,762 cr | 67,942 cr |
| Total income | 72,891 cr | 84,341 cr | 70,318 cr |
| Expenses | 65,730 cr | 75,999 cr | 63,396 cr |
| Profit before tax | 5,370 cr | 8,410 cr | 6,922 cr |
| Tax | 1,541 cr | 2,093 cr | 1,939 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 3,215 cr | 5,326 cr | 4,123 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 4.5% | 6.4% | 6.1% |
| EPS (₹) | 23.37 | 38.71 | 29.97 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larsen & Toubro Limitedthis company | ₹3,836 | ₹5.28 L cr | 32.0 | 15.1% | 6.1% | — |
| Rail Vikas Nigam Limited | ₹202 | ₹42,055 cr | 66.3 | 6.5% | 3.7% | — |
| Kalpataru Projects International Limited | ₹1,399 | ₹23,900 cr | 19.3 | 15.9% | 4.8% | — |
| IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited | ₹19 | ₹22,767 cr | 18.9 | 5.8% | 14.3% | — |
| NBCC (India) Limited | ₹82 | ₹22,175 cr | 36.0 | 20.5% | 6.9% | — |
| Cemindia Projects Limited | ₹1,255 | ₹21,563 cr | 38.3 | 23.5% | 5.2% | — |
| Engineers India Limited | ₹264 | ₹14,824 cr | 23.5 | 20.1% | 19.3% | — |
| Techno Electric & Engineering Company Limited | ₹985 | ₹11,452 cr | 30.7 | 9.0% | 14.8% | — |
| KEC International Limited | ₹402 | ₹10,700 cr | 36.8 | 4.7% | 1.4% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹38 / share | 22 May 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹34 / share | 3 Jun 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹28 / share | 20 Jun 2024 |
| Buyback | Buy Back | 12 Sep 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹24 / share | 2 Aug 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹6 / share | 2 Aug 2023 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.