IFB Industries Limited
IFB Industries Limited operates in Household Appliances, part of the Consumer Durables sector. It booked ₹1,585 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 2.7% of sales as profit. It is the 9th largest of 9 Household Appliances companies we track, by market value.
| Segment | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home appliances | 2,128 | 2,273 | 2,723 | 3,315 | 3,472 | 4,461 | 80% → 78% |
| Engineering | 459 | 486 | 617 | 754 | 837 | 1,007 | 17% → 18% |
| Steel | — | — | 36 | 142 | 157 | 194 | 3% |
| Motor | 27 | 34 | 49 | 71 | 67 | 76 | 1% → 1% |
| Others | 52 | 75 | 87 | — | — | — | — |
| Total | 2,666 | 2,868 | 3,512 | 4,282 | 4,533 | 5,739 |
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
“The Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing of fine blanked and stamping components, manufacturing and trading of home appliances and the manufacture of cold rolled steel strips and motors.”
“IFB Refrigeration Limited is engaged in the business of manufacturing, selling and other services related to refrigerators.”
Healthier than 67% of companies in Consumer Durables, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 30–41 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 30
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in IFBIND?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 15%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹1,585 cr |
| Other Income | ₹6 cr |
| Total Income | ₹1,591 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹823 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹233 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-54 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹114 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹5 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹33 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹380 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹1,534 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹57 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹14 cr |
| Share of JV / Associates | ₹33 L |
| Net Profit | ₹43 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 2.7% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,413 cr | 1,498 cr | 1,585 cr |
| Total income | 1,420 cr | 1,507 cr | 1,591 cr |
| Expenses | 1,373 cr | 1,455 cr | 1,534 cr |
| Profit before tax | 34 cr | 52 cr | 57 cr |
| Tax | 8 cr | 13 cr | 14 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 24 cr | 43 cr | 43 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 1.7% | 2.8% | 2.7% |
| EPS (₹) | 5.91 | 10.53 | 10.62 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LG Electronics India Limited | ₹1,653 | ₹1.12 L cr | 43.0 | 34.1% | 9.0% | — |
| Voltas Limited | ₹1,135 | ₹37,546 cr | 43.9 | 13.4% | 4.6% | — |
| Blue Star Limited | ₹1,553 | ₹31,930 cr | 77.8 | 11.9% | 3.0% | — |
| Crompton Greaves Consumer Electricals Limited | ₹225 | ₹14,494 cr | 25.8 | 18.9% | 6.3% | — |
| V-Guard Industries Limited | ₹330 | ₹14,424 cr | 27.8 | 22.0% | 7.2% | — |
| Whirlpool of India Limited | ₹727 | ₹9,229 cr | 22.4 | 9.9% | 3.8% | — |
| Eureka Forbes Limited | ₹391 | ₹7,568 cr | 33.4 | 5.0% | 8.1% | — |
| TTK Prestige Limited | ₹544 | ₹7,447 cr | 31.4 | 12.0% | 7.3% | — |
| IFB Industries Limitedthis company | ₹1,218 | ₹5,027 cr | 28.7 | 17.3% | 2.7% | — |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 9 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.