LT Foods Limited
LT Foods Limited operates in Other Agricultural Products, part of the Fast Moving Consumer Goods sector. It booked ₹3,152 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 5.8% of sales as profit. It is the largest of 9 Other Agricultural Products companies we track, by market value.
“LT Foods Ltd is engaged in the business of food and its products are consumed at the end-user level.”
Healthier than 73% of companies in Fast Moving Consumer Goods, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 89–149 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 46
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in LTFOODS?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 15%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹3,152 cr |
| Other Income | ₹9 cr |
| Total Income | ₹3,161 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹1,638 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹397 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹97 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹180 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹40 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹74 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹486 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹2,912 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹249 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹66 cr |
| Share of JV / Associates | ₹89.9 L |
| Net Profit | ₹183 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 5.8% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2,809 cr | 2,907 cr | 3,152 cr |
| Total income | 2,812 cr | 2,938 cr | 3,161 cr |
| Expenses | 2,593 cr | 2,747 cr | 2,912 cr |
| Profit before tax | 219 cr | 191 cr | 249 cr |
| Tax | 63 cr | 53 cr | 66 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 157 cr | 136 cr | 183 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 5.6% | 4.7% | 5.8% |
| EPS (₹) | 4.53 | 3.91 | 5.28 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LT Foods Limitedthis company | ₹422 | ₹14,651 cr | 20.0 | 16.2% | 5.8% | — |
| KRBL Limited | ₹395 | ₹9,051 cr | 8.7 | 18.0% | 17.4% | — |
| Gujarat Ambuja Exports Limited | ₹159 | ₹7,312 cr | 10.4 | 21.5% | 11.1% | — |
| TruAlt Bioenergy Limited | ₹424 | ₹3,635 cr | 15.9 | 15.0% | 9.1% | — |
| Kaveri Seed Company Limited | ₹703 | ₹3,618 cr | 3.2 | 63.7% | 37.7% | — |
| Sanstar Limited | ₹116 | ₹2,314 cr | 57.8 | — | 4.5% | — |
| Amir Chand Jagdish Kumar (Exports) Limited | ₹194 | ₹2,006 cr | 13.6 | 15.9% | 5.5% | — |
| GRM Overseas Limited | ₹80 | ₹1,660 cr | 39.3 | 14.0% | 4.9% | — |
| Chaman Lal Setia Exports Limited | ₹296 | ₹1,470 cr | 11.5 | 15.3% | 9.2% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹1 / share | 2 Feb 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹1 / share | 19 Sep 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹1 / share | 1 Aug 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹0.5 / share | 4 Feb 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹0.5 / share | 6 Nov 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹1 / share | 17 Sep 2024 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 23 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.