Power Mech Projects Limited
Power Mech Projects Limited operates in Civil Construction, part of the Construction sector. It booked ₹1,624 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 4.9% of sales as profit.
“Power Mech Projects Limited, established in 1999 by Sajja Kishore Babu and headquartered in Hyderabad, is a leading construction, engineering, O&M services and infrastructure company with global operations. Initially, the company provided maintenance services for coal and gas-based plants.”
Healthier than 66% of companies in Construction, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 11–23 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 42
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in POWERMECH?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹1,624 cr |
| Other Income | ₹9 cr |
| Total Income | ₹1,632 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹169 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-80 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹215 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹27 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹23 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹1,152 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹1,506 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹126 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹37 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹89 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 5.5% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,420 cr | 2,111 cr | 1,624 cr |
| Total income | 1,433 cr | 2,121 cr | 1,632 cr |
| Expenses | 1,309 cr | 1,933 cr | 1,506 cr |
| Profit before tax | 124 cr | 188 cr | 126 cr |
| Tax | 24 cr | 33 cr | 37 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 94 cr | 143 cr | 80 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 6.6% | 6.8% | 4.9% |
| EPS (₹) | 29.73 | 45.09 | 25.23 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larsen & Toubro Limited | ₹3,836 | ₹5.28 L cr | 32.0 | 15.1% | 6.1% | — |
| Rail Vikas Nigam Limited | ₹202 | ₹42,055 cr | 66.3 | 6.5% | 3.7% | — |
| Kalpataru Projects International Limited | ₹1,399 | ₹23,900 cr | 19.3 | 15.9% | 4.8% | — |
| IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited | ₹19 | ₹22,767 cr | 18.9 | 5.8% | 14.3% | — |
| NBCC (India) Limited | ₹82 | ₹22,175 cr | 36.0 | 20.5% | 6.9% | — |
| Cemindia Projects Limited | ₹1,255 | ₹21,563 cr | 38.3 | 23.5% | 5.2% | — |
| Engineers India Limited | ₹264 | ₹14,824 cr | 23.5 | 20.1% | 19.3% | — |
| Techno Electric & Engineering Company Limited | ₹985 | ₹11,452 cr | 30.7 | 9.0% | 14.8% | — |
| KEC International Limited | ₹402 | ₹10,700 cr | 36.8 | 4.7% | 1.4% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹1.5 / share | 10 Sep 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹1.25 / share | 15 Sep 2025 |
| Bonus issue | 1:1 | 8 Oct 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 20 Sep 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 21 Sep 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹1.5 / share | 22 Sep 2022 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 8 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.