Anthem Biosciences Limited
Anthem Biosciences Limited operates in Biotechnology, part of the Healthcare sector. It booked ₹418 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 28.7% of sales as profit.
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
“Anthem is among India’s leading innovation-focused CRDMOs, providing integrated services across Our Values discovery, development and commercial manufacturing.”
Healthier than 66% of companies in Healthcare, on the 5 of 6 measures we could read for it. Each measure is ranked against the 116–150 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 56
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
Not measurable for this company: growth & consistency. Those pillars are left out of the score rather than counted as zero.
What if I invest in ANTHEM?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 5%, taken from a generic assumption, not this company's history. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹418 cr |
| Other Income | ₹25 cr |
| Total Income | ₹443 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹149 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-2 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹79 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹88.7 L |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹30 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹43 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹299 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹145 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹25 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹120 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 27.1% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 423 cr | 611 cr | 418 cr |
| Total income | 457 cr | 662 cr | 443 cr |
| Expenses | 301 cr | 385 cr | 299 cr |
| Profit before tax | 130 cr | 278 cr | 145 cr |
| Tax | 38 cr | 88 cr | 25 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 93 cr | 190 cr | 120 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 21.9% | 31.1% | 28.7% |
| EPS (₹) | 1.65 | 3.38 | 2.13 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited | ₹1,867 | ₹4.48 L cr | 38.6 | 13.9% | 18.9% | — |
| Divi's Laboratories Limited | ₹9,323 | ₹2.47 L cr | 68.7 | 21.5% | 29.3% | — |
| Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited | ₹4,875 | ₹1.65 L cr | 82.0 | 27.0% | 11.5% | — |
| Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Limited | ₹8,769 | ₹1.26 L cr | 54.3 | 24.5% | 8.2% | — |
| Zydus Lifesciences Limited | ₹1,135 | ₹1.13 L cr | 30.4 | 13.9% | 11.7% | — |
| Cipla Limited | ₹1,376 | ₹1.11 L cr | 35.2 | 9.2% | 11.1% | — |
| Laurus Labs Limited | ₹1,948 | ₹1.05 L cr | 71.5 | 27.7% | 18.1% | — |
| Max Healthcare Institute Limited | ₹1,037 | ₹1.01 L cr | 78.1 | 12.0% | 13.6% | — |
| Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited | ₹1,175 | ₹98,113 cr | 55.1 | 4.7% | 5.5% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 25 Jun 2026 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 3 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.