Kridhan Infra Limited
Kridhan Infra Limited operates in Civil Construction, part of the Industrials sector. It booked ₹81.7 L of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 4.7% of sales as profit.
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
“The Company is engaged in the business of trading in iron and steel and allied materials. 2.”
Healthier than 38% of companies in Industrials, on the 5 of 6 measures we could read for it. Each measure is ranked against the 166–290 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 19
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
Not measurable for this company: valuation. Those pillars are left out of the score rather than counted as zero.
What if I invest in KRIDHANINF?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹81.7 L |
| Other Income | ₹45 L |
| Total Income | ₹1 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹0 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹43.7 L |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹13.5 L |
| Finance Costs | ₹22.1 L |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹5.2 L |
| Other Expenses | ₹38.3 L |
| Total Expenses | ₹1 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹3.8 L |
| Tax Expense | ₹0 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹3.8 L |
| Net margin on total income | 3.0% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 21.5 L | 43.6 L | 81.7 L |
| Total income | 21.8 L | 2 cr | 1 cr |
| Expenses | 72.8 L | 64.4 L | 1 cr |
| Profit before tax | -27 L | 92.8 L | 3.8 L |
| Tax | 0 cr | 0 cr | 0 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | -27 L | 92.8 L | 3.8 L |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | -125.6% | 212.7% | 4.7% |
| EPS (₹) | -0.03 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larsen & Toubro Limited | ₹3,836 | ₹5.28 L cr | 32.0 | 15.1% | 6.1% | — |
| Rail Vikas Nigam Limited | ₹202 | ₹42,055 cr | 66.3 | 6.5% | 3.7% | — |
| Kalpataru Projects International Limited | ₹1,399 | ₹23,900 cr | 19.3 | 15.9% | 4.8% | — |
| IRB Infrastructure Developers Limited | ₹19 | ₹22,767 cr | 18.9 | 5.8% | 14.3% | — |
| NBCC (India) Limited | ₹82 | ₹22,175 cr | 36.0 | 20.5% | 6.9% | — |
| Cemindia Projects Limited | ₹1,255 | ₹21,563 cr | 38.3 | 23.5% | 5.2% | — |
| Engineers India Limited | ₹264 | ₹14,824 cr | 23.5 | 20.1% | 19.3% | — |
| Techno Electric & Engineering Company Limited | ₹985 | ₹11,452 cr | 30.7 | 9.0% | 14.8% | — |
| KEC International Limited | ₹402 | ₹10,700 cr | 36.8 | 4.7% | 1.4% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹0.2 / share | 18 Sep 2018 |
| Dividend | ₹0.2 / share | 20 Sep 2017 |
| Dividend | ₹0.16 / share | 21 Sep 2016 |
| Dividend | ₹0.2 / share | 16 Sep 2015 |
| Stock split | Stock Split From Rs.10/- to Rs.2/- | 27 Oct 2014 |
| Dividend | ₹0.5 / share | 18 Sep 2014 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.
When a company raises money from investors, it has to say up front what the money is for. The rules then make it report, every three months until the money is gone, how much of each of those things it has actually paid for — so a promise made while asking for the money can be checked afterwards.
As of Jun 2026, the company says it has spent 37% of what it set aside.
The amount this filing states as raised is many times the whole company’s market value, so it is almost certainly entered in the wrong unit. We show the purposes and how far along each one is, and leave the rupee figures out rather than repeat a number that cannot be right.
As of Mar 2026, the company says it has spent 29% of what it set aside, leaving ₹30 cr still to be spent.
Every figure above is taken from the statement the company files with the stock exchange each quarter, for as long as money it has raised remains unspent. The only thing we work out is how much of each stated purpose has been paid for — one number divided by another from the same filing. Whether a plan that changed was a good change is not something a filing can tell you. See the filing