Latent View Analytics Limited
Latent View Analytics Limited operates in Computers - Software & Consulting, part of the Information Technology sector. It booked ₹287 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 16.8% of sales as profit.
“Our impact in numbers up into a globally trusted analytics partner to some of the world’s most What defines us our story recognized brands. Each milestone reflects more than progress; it marks Our journey Strengthening capabilities through our continued pursuit of turning data into decisive, measurable impact.”
Healthier than 63% of companies in Information Technology, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 42–123 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 32
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in LATENTVIEW?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 14%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹287 cr |
| Other Income | ₹21 cr |
| Total Income | ₹308 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹0 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹197 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹1 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹11 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹33 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹243 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹65 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹18 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹47 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 15.3% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 278 cr | 289 cr | 287 cr |
| Total income | 296 cr | 305 cr | 308 cr |
| Expenses | 229 cr | 234 cr | 243 cr |
| Profit before tax | 67 cr | 71 cr | 65 cr |
| Tax | 16 cr | 16 cr | 18 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 50 cr | 53 cr | 48 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 18.0% | 18.3% | 16.8% |
| EPS (₹) | 2.43 | 2.55 | 2.33 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tata Consultancy Services Limited | ₹2,190 | ₹7.93 L cr | 14.8 | 49.8% | 18.5% | — |
| Infosys Limited | ₹1,059 | ₹4.29 L cr | 13.8 | 33.5% | 16.1% | — |
| HCL Technologies Limited | ₹1,258 | ₹3.42 L cr | 18.4 | 24.6% | 13.4% | — |
| Wipro Limited | ₹166 | ₹1.65 L cr | 13.0 | 15.2% | 13.7% | — |
| Tech Mahindra Limited | ₹1,561 | ₹1.38 L cr | 23.6 | 19.8% | 9.3% | — |
| LTM Limited | ₹4,265 | ₹1.26 L cr | 21.6 | 24.4% | 12.6% | — |
| Persistent Systems Limited | ₹5,473 | ₹86,337 cr | 44.3 | 24.7% | 11.2% | — |
| Coforge Limited | ₹1,793 | ₹79,340 cr | 36.3 | 21.7% | 9.4% | — |
| MphasiS Limited | ₹2,320 | ₹44,284 cr | 22.6 | 18.2% | 11.2% | — |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 8 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.