Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited
Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited operates in Residential, Commercial Projects, part of the Consumer Discretionary sector. It booked ₹184 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q4 FY25) and kept -589.9% of sales as profit.
“The Company is engaged in the business of real estate development which has been classified as infrastructural facilities as per Schedule VI to the Act.”
Healthier than 34% of companies in Consumer Discretionary, on the 5 of 6 measures we could read for it. Each measure is ranked against the 69–421 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 67
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs · lowest in its sector on what we could measure
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold
Not measurable for this company: valuation. Those pillars are left out of the score rather than counted as zero.
What if I invest in ANSALAPI?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 0%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹184 cr |
| Other Income | ₹9 cr |
| Total Income | ₹193 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹551 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-16 L |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹6 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹2 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹9 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹773 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹1,340 cr |
| Exceptional Items | ₹-20 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹-1,168 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹-78 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹-1,085 cr |
| Net margin on total income | -563.5% |
The company made a net loss of ₹1,085 cr this quarter — income covered only ₹14 of every ₹100 it spent on costs and tax.
| Metric | Q2 FY25 | Q3 FY25 | Q4 FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 227 cr | 234 cr | 184 cr |
| Total income | 229 cr | 235 cr | 193 cr |
| Expenses | 377 cr | 229 cr | 1,340 cr |
| Profit before tax | -290 cr | 167 cr | -1,168 cr |
| Tax | -6 cr | 3 cr | -78 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | -289 cr | 165 cr | -1,084 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | -127.6% | 70.6% | -589.9% |
| EPS (₹) | -18.37 | 10.51 | -68.84 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLF Limited | ₹640 | ₹1.58 L cr | 49.8 | 7.0% | 62.0% | — |
| Lodha Developers Limited | ₹1,103 | ₹1.10 L cr | 20.1 | 23.6% | 27.5% | — |
| The Phoenix Mills Limited | ₹1,872 | ₹66,957 cr | 56.4 | 10.8% | 27.6% | — |
| Oberoi Realty Limited | ₹1,741 | ₹63,292 cr | 29.1 | 12.1% | 41.8% | — |
| Prestige Estates Projects Limited | ₹1,440 | ₹62,025 cr | 65.7 | 5.8% | 8.8% | — |
| Godrej Properties Limited | ₹1,678 | ₹50,551 cr | 36.1 | 7.3% | 69.2% | — |
| Anant Raj Limited | ₹597 | ₹21,482 cr | 35.9 | 10.3% | 23.7% | — |
| Brigade Enterprises Limited | ₹621 | ₹20,251 cr | 25.3 | 11.8% | 18.0% | — |
| Horizon Industrial Parks Limited | ₹52 | ₹12,779 cr | — | — | -5.1% | — |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 39 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.