NACL Industries Limited
NACL Industries Limited operates in Pesticides & Agrochemicals, part of the Commodities sector. It booked ₹383 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 5.4% of sales as profit. It is the 7th largest of 9 Pesticides & Agrochemicals companies we track, by market value.
“The Company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of crop protection Control is achieved when the Group: and manufactures both Technicals (Active Ingredient) and Formulations.”
Healthier than 39% of companies in Commodities, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 91–173 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 25
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in NACLIND?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 5%, taken from this company's own revenue trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹383 cr |
| Other Income | ₹2 cr |
| Total Income | ₹385 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹343 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹10 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-114 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹44 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹6 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹9 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹59 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹357 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹28 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹7 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹21 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 5.4% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 318 cr | 361 cr | 383 cr |
| Total income | 318 cr | 363 cr | 385 cr |
| Expenses | 332 cr | 364 cr | 357 cr |
| Profit before tax | -14 cr | -1 cr | 28 cr |
| Tax | -3 cr | -33 L | 7 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | -10 cr | -86 L | 21 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | -3.2% | -0.2% | 5.4% |
| EPS (₹) | -0.47 | -0.04 | 0.89 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPL Limited | ₹555 | ₹3.37 L cr | 1,155.7 | 0.1% | 0.1% | — |
| PI Industries Limited | ₹2,307 | ₹35,066 cr | 35.8 | 9.8% | 16.2% | — |
| Sumitomo Chemical India Limited | ₹455 | ₹22,734 cr | 26.5 | 25.4% | 20.2% | — |
| Sharda Cropchem Limited | ₹742 | ₹6,692 cr | 19.0 | 11.2% | 8.2% | — |
| Dhanuka Agritech Limited | ₹982 | ₹4,428 cr | 14.7 | 21.5% | 17.1% | — |
| Rallis India Limited | ₹204 | ₹3,971 cr | — | — | -2.8% | — |
| NACL Industries Limitedthis company | ₹149 | ₹3,488 cr | 41.8 | 12.2% | 5.4% | — |
| Bhagiradha Chemicals & Industries Limited | ₹248 | ₹3,215 cr | 60.2 | 7.6% | 6.8% | — |
| GSP Crop Science Limited | ₹484 | ₹2,252 cr | 21.3 | 13.7% | 6.8% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Rights issue | 31:5 | 12 Dec 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹0.25 / share | 8 Sep 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹0.15 / share | 10 Feb 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹0.3 / share | 1 Nov 2022 |
| Dividend | ₹0.15 / share | 15 Sep 2022 |
| Dividend | ₹0.15 / share | 10 Feb 2022 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.
When a company raises money from investors, it has to say up front what the money is for. The rules then make it report, every three months until the money is gone, how much of each of those things it has actually paid for — so a promise made while asking for the money can be checked afterwards.
The company has not broken this money down into purposes in its filing for Jun 2026, so there is nothing to measure it against yet. CRISIL Ratings Limited watches the spending on the exchange’s behalf.
The company has not broken this money down into purposes in its filing for Mar 2025, so there is nothing to measure it against yet.
The amount this filing states as raised is many times the whole company’s market value, so it is almost certainly entered in the wrong unit. We show the purposes and how far along each one is, and leave the rupee figures out rather than repeat a number that cannot be right.
Every figure above is taken from the statement the company files with the stock exchange each quarter, for as long as money it has raised remains unspent. The only thing we work out is how much of each stated purpose has been paid for — one number divided by another from the same filing. Whether a plan that changed was a good change is not something a filing can tell you. See the filing