Raymond Lifestyle Limited
Raymond Lifestyle Limited operates in Other Textile Products, part of the Textiles sector. It booked ₹1,516 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept -1.5% of sales as profit.
| Segment | FY25 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| Textile | 3,002 | 3,435 | 46% → 47% |
| Apparel | 1,593 | 1,812 | 24% → 25% |
| Garmenting | 1,068 | 1,066 | 16% → 15% |
| Shirting | 800 | 818 | 12% → 11% |
| Emerging businesses | — | — | — |
| Others | 95 | 111 | 1% → 2% |
| Total | 6,558 | 7,241 |
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
“Our business is organised into four focused segments: Shaping Style across Generations We are an established fashion and retail Company in India, built on a century of textile expertise and associated with some of the country’s most recognised men’s fashion brands.”
Healthier than 54% of listed companies we score, on the 5 of 6 measures we could read for it. Each measure is ranked against the 412–2,858 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 40
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold
Not measurable for this company: growth & consistency. Those pillars are left out of the score rather than counted as zero.
What if I invest in RAYMONDLSL?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 5%, taken from a generic assumption, not this company's history. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹1,516 cr |
| Other Income | ₹45 cr |
| Total Income | ₹1,560 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹358 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹365 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-26 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹239 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹63 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹109 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹490 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹1,599 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹-38 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹-16 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹-23 cr |
| Net margin on total income | -1.4% |
The company made a net loss of ₹23 cr this quarter — income covered only ₹98 of every ₹100 it spent on costs and tax.
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,849 cr | 1,776 cr | 1,516 cr |
| Total income | 1,883 cr | 1,810 cr | 1,560 cr |
| Expenses | 1,764 cr | 1,811 cr | 1,599 cr |
| Profit before tax | 62 cr | -68 cr | -38 cr |
| Tax | 19 cr | -16 cr | -16 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 43 cr | -52 cr | -23 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 2.3% | -2.9% | -1.5% |
| EPS (₹) | 7.04 | -8.55 | -3.71 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K.P.R. Mill Limited | ₹1,095 | ₹37,441 cr | 36.2 | 18.2% | 13.4% | — |
| Welspun Living Limited | ₹212 | ₹20,051 cr | 31.4 | 13.1% | 5.7% | — |
| Vardhman Textiles Limited | ₹561 | ₹15,986 cr | 12.9 | 11.8% | 11.5% | — |
| Trident Limited | ₹23 | ₹11,762 cr | 18.6 | 13.3% | 8.8% | — |
| Indo Count Industries Limited | ₹436 | ₹8,625 cr | 34.1 | 10.7% | 5.2% | — |
| Garware Technical Fibres Limited | ₹800 | ₹7,809 cr | 30.5 | 19.1% | 13.4% | — |
| Kusumgar Limited | ₹552 | ₹5,790 cr | 33.0 | — | 17.2% | — |
| Jindal Worldwide Limited | ₹49 | ₹4,913 cr | 38.3 | 15.1% | 5.8% | — |
| Filatex India Limited | ₹90 | ₹4,012 cr | 20.7 | 12.9% | 4.2% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹1 / share | 29 Jun 2026 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.