Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited
Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited operates in Passenger Cars & Utility Vehicles, part of the Automobile and Auto Components sector. It booked ₹95,799 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 0.8% of sales as profit. It is the 4th largest of 7 Passenger Cars & Utility Vehicles companies we track, by market value.
| Segment | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - Jaguar and Land Rover | 3.03 | 3.14 | 2.73 | 69% → 81% |
| Passenger Vehicle | 0.52 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 12% → 17% |
| Others | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1% → 2% |
| Corporate/Unallocable | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0% → 0% |
| Automotive and related activity | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% → 0% |
| - Tata and other brands vehicles | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0% → 0% |
| Commercial Vehicle | 0.79 | 0.75 | — | — |
| Total | 4.40 | 4.44 | 3.37 |
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
Healthier than 38% of companies in Automobile and Auto Components, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 37–48 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 50
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in TMPV?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 15%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹95,799 cr |
| Other Income | ₹1,129 cr |
| Total Income | ₹96,928 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹60,835 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹4,884 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-5,474 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹12,738 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹835 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹4,880 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹16,640 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹95,338 cr |
| Exceptional Items | ₹-32 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹1,558 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹715 cr |
| Share of JV / Associates | ₹16 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹859 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 0.9% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 70,108 cr | 1.05 L cr | 95,799 cr |
| Total income | 71,575 cr | 1.07 L cr | 96,928 cr |
| Expenses | 74,880 cr | 1.00 L cr | 95,338 cr |
| Profit before tax | -4,902 cr | 7,143 cr | 1,558 cr |
| Tax | -1,250 cr | 1,399 cr | 715 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | -3,486 cr | 5,783 cr | 775 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | -5.0% | 5.5% | 0.8% |
| EPS (₹) | -9.47 | 15.71 | 2.10 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maruti Suzuki India Limited | ₹12,338 | ₹3.88 L cr | 28.1 | 12.9% | 6.6% | — |
| Mahindra & Mahindra Limited | ₹3,077 | ₹3.44 L cr | 15.8 | 23.4% | 9.4% | — |
| Hyundai Motor India Limited | ₹2,160 | ₹1.76 L cr | 49.4 | 17.8% | 5.4% | — |
| Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Limitedthis company | ₹315 | ₹1.16 L cr | 37.4 | 2.8% | 0.8% | — |
| FORCE MOTORS LTD | ₹17,650 | ₹23,263 cr | 26.8 | 20.7% | 8.9% | — |
| Olectra Greentech Limited | ₹1,186 | ₹9,738 cr | 93.8 | 8.5% | 4.5% | — |
| Mercury Ev-Tech Limited | ₹41 | ₹776 cr | — | — | 4.9% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹3 / share | 19 Jun 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹6 / share | 4 Jun 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹3 / share | 11 Jun 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 28 Jul 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹0.2 / share | 18 Jul 2016 |
| Rights issue | 109:6 | 6 Apr 2015 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 6 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.