Chemplast Sanmar Limited
Chemplast Sanmar Limited operates in Specialty Chemicals, part of the Commodities sector. It booked ₹1,125 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept -15.6% of sales as profit.
| Segment | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commodity | 3,000 | 2,448 | 2,298 | 2,262 | 58% → 51% |
| Specialities | 2,197 | 1,656 | 2,388 | 2,170 | 42% → 49% |
| Total | 5,197 | 4,103 | 4,686 | 4,432 |
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
“Sustainability at the Core: Driving Excellence and Responsible Growth Chemplast Sanmar fundamentally integrates sustainability into its core operational framework, establishing new benchmarks in the speciality chemicals sector.”
Healthier than 31% of companies in Commodities, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 121–173 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 41
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs · lowest in its sector on what we could measure
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in CHEMPLASTS?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹1,125 cr |
| Other Income | ₹3 cr |
| Total Income | ₹1,127 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹913 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-66 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹73 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹59 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹61 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹319 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹1,359 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹-232 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹-57 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹-176 cr |
| Net margin on total income | -15.6% |
The company made a net loss of ₹176 cr this quarter — income covered only ₹83 of every ₹100 it spent on costs and tax.
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 835 cr | 1,256 cr | 1,125 cr |
| Total income | 841 cr | 1,262 cr | 1,127 cr |
| Expenses | 1,003 cr | 1,173 cr | 1,359 cr |
| Profit before tax | -163 cr | -61 cr | -232 cr |
| Tax | -44 cr | -16 cr | -57 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | -119 cr | -45 cr | -176 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | -14.3% | -3.6% | -15.6% |
| EPS (₹) | -7.45 | -2.87 | -11.10 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pidilite Industries Limited | ₹1,552 | ₹1.58 L cr | 45.3 | 32.2% | 19.2% | — |
| Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited | ₹4,472 | ₹49,190 cr | 55.4 | 11.2% | 13.9% | — |
| Navin Fluorine International Limited | ₹8,220 | ₹42,169 cr | 43.3 | 24.5% | 23.3% | — |
| Deepak Nitrite Limited | ₹1,605 | ₹21,889 cr | 15.9 | 23.6% | 13.4% | — |
| Aether Industries Limited | ₹1,623 | ₹21,543 cr | 85.1 | 10.2% | 19.2% | — |
| Atul Limited | ₹6,134 | ₹18,057 cr | 18.4 | 15.8% | 13.3% | — |
| Aarti Industries Limited | ₹477 | ₹17,287 cr | 27.9 | 10.4% | 6.5% | — |
| Fine Organic Industries Limited | ₹5,202 | ₹15,949 cr | 28.9 | 20.7% | 19.9% | — |
| BASF India Limited | ₹3,602 | ₹15,591 cr | 11.2 | 36.4% | 7.5% | — |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 7 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.