Clean Science and Technology Limited
Clean Science and Technology Limited operates in Specialty Chemicals, part of the Chemicals sector. It booked ₹299 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) and kept 18.6% of sales as profit.
“CATALYSING SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION Clean Science and Technology Limited (referred to as ‘CSTL’ or ‘the Company’) is one of the largest manufacturers of fine and specialty chemicals in the world through a differentiated sustainable catalytic route of synthesis.”
Healthier than 71% of companies in Chemicals, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 36–46 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 26
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in CLEAN?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The slider starts at 15%, taken from this company's own free-cash-flow trend. That is history, not a forecast — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-11-04.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹299 cr |
| Other Income | ₹6 cr |
| Total Income | ₹305 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹149 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹0 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-21 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹16 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹2 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹21 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹64 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹231 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹74 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹19 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹56 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 18.3% |
| Metric | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 249 cr | 268 cr | 299 cr |
| Total income | 252 cr | 291 cr | 305 cr |
| Expenses | 174 cr | 193 cr | 231 cr |
| Profit before tax | 78 cr | 98 cr | 74 cr |
| Tax | 19 cr | 24 cr | 19 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 58 cr | 73 cr | 56 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 23.4% | 27.3% | 18.6% |
| EPS (₹) | 5.48 | 6.90 | 0.00 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pidilite Industries Limited | ₹1,511 | ₹1.54 L cr | 62.5 | 21.9% | 14.3% | — |
| Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited | ₹4,464 | ₹49,103 cr | 55.3 | 11.2% | 13.9% | — |
| Navin Fluorine International Limited | ₹8,530 | ₹43,759 cr | 40.6 | 24.1% | 22.6% | — |
| Deepak Nitrite Limited | ₹1,521 | ₹20,741 cr | 13.0 | 24.6% | 12.9% | — |
| Aether Industries Limited | ₹1,501 | ₹19,924 cr | 73.3 | 10.5% | 19.6% | — |
| Aarti Industries Limited | ₹439 | ₹15,930 cr | 23.6 | 10.7% | 4.6% | — |
| Fine Organic Industries Limited | ₹5,089 | ₹15,603 cr | 25.6 | 20.8% | 20.9% | — |
| Atul Limited | ₹5,073 | ₹14,935 cr | 24.0 | 9.5% | 8.3% | — |
| BASF India Limited | ₹3,138 | ₹13,584 cr | 9.8 | 36.4% | 7.5% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹4 / share | 4 Sep 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 6 Feb 2026 |
| Dividend | ₹4 / share | 4 Sep 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 7 Feb 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹3 / share | 29 Aug 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹2 / share | 12 Feb 2024 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 18 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.