Everest Kanto Cylinder Limited
Everest Kanto Cylinder Limited operates in Industrial Products, part of the Industrials sector. It booked ₹346 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q1 FY27) and kept 8.7% of sales as profit.
| Segment | FY25 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| India | 948 | 967 | 62% → 64% |
| U.S.A and Hungary | 374 | 356 | 25% → 24% |
| U.A.E (Dubai) | 175 | 152 | 12% → 10% |
| Others | 27 | 32 | 2% → 2% |
| Total | 1,525 | 1,507 |
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
Healthier than 63% of companies in Industrials, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 51–290 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 35
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold · highest in its sector on what we could measure
What if I invest in EKC?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-09-17.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹346 cr |
| Other Income | ₹10 cr |
| Total Income | ₹356 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹149 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹69 L |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹14 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹47 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹4 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹15 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹89 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹318 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹39 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹8 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹30 cr |
| Net margin on total income | 8.5% |
| Metric | Q3 FY26 | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 365 cr | 358 cr | 346 cr |
| Total income | 376 cr | 358 cr | 356 cr |
| Expenses | 322 cr | 337 cr | 318 cr |
| Profit before tax | 51 cr | 23 cr | 39 cr |
| Tax | 15 cr | -23 cr | 8 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | 36 cr | 46 cr | 30 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | 9.8% | 12.8% | 8.7% |
| EPS (₹) | 3.18 | 4.09 | 2.68 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INDO-MIM Limited | ₹993 | ₹48,086 cr | 50.1 | — | 19.7% | — |
| Aditya Infotech Limited | ₹3,378 | ₹39,814 cr | 70.0 | 30.3% | 10.1% | — |
| Syrma SGS Technology Limited | ₹1,618 | ₹31,158 cr | 77.9 | 14.8% | 6.7% | — |
| Honeywell Automation India Limited | ₹33,915 | ₹29,845 cr | 49.7 | 13.5% | 12.5% | — |
| Kaynes Technology India Limited | ₹3,520 | ₹23,596 cr | 104.5 | 4.8% | 6.0% | — |
| Jyoti CNC Automation Limited | ₹981 | ₹22,305 cr | 97.7 | 11.4% | 11.2% | — |
| LMW Limited | ₹18,170 | ₹19,406 cr | 87.4 | 7.7% | 6.5% | — |
| Tega Industries Limited | ₹1,920 | ₹14,425 cr | — | -10.1% | -5.0% | — |
| LLOYDS ENGINEERING WORKS LIMITED | ₹80 | ₹11,801 cr | 42.7 | 15.3% | 12.1% | — |
| Action | Detail | Ex-date |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend | ₹0.7 / share | 14 Aug 2025 |
| Dividend | ₹0.7 / share | 23 Aug 2024 |
| Dividend | ₹0.7 / share | 15 Sep 2023 |
| Dividend | ₹0.7 / share | 15 Sep 2022 |
| Dividend | ₹0.3 / share | 15 Sep 2021 |
| Dividend | ₹0.2 / share | 10 Jul 2013 |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
The company also transacted with 14 other related parties — subsidiaries, joint ventures, directors and others — that we could not match by name to the promoter list above. Some may still be connected to the family; we only count the ones the filings let us match with certainty.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.