RattanIndia Enterprises Limited
RattanIndia Enterprises Limited operates in E-Retail/ E-Commerce, part of the Consumer Services sector. It booked ₹2,062 cr of revenue in its latest quarter (Q2 FY27) and kept -1.2% of sales as profit. It is the 9th largest of 9 E-Retail/ E-Commerce companies we track, by market value.
| Segment | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retail- E-commerce business | 4,066 | 5,490 | 6,543 | 7,368 | 99% → 98% |
| EV (E-Motorcycles) | — | 26 | 151 | 136 | 2% |
| Others | 61 | 100 | 30 | 44 | 1% → 1% |
| Investment | — | — | 164 | 0 | 0% |
| Total | 4,127 | 5,615 | 6,887 | 7,549 |
From the company's consolidated segment filings (Ind AS 108). Margin is segment operating profit (before interest & tax) over segment revenue; reconciliation rows like inter-segment eliminations are excluded from the mix.
“Shaping The Next At the intersection of innovation and opportunity stands RattanIndia Enterprise Ltd, a dynamic force reshaping industries through cutting-edge ventures in e-commerce, retail, electric motorbikes and drone technology. As India accelerates toward a $5 trillion economy, we’re not just adapting to change, we’re driving it.”
Healthier than 36% of companies in Consumer Services, on all six measures of filed financials. Each measure is ranked against the 8–46 companies that reported it.
Measures financial condition, not whether to buy. Learn what this score means · How this is calculated
- RSI (14)
- 49
At close. Not part of the score.
How much profit it earns on the money it employs
How much it owes, and whether earnings cover the interest
Whether reported profit actually arrives as cash
Whether sales and profit have grown, and how steadily
What today's price implies, against our models or its peers
How much of the promoters' stake is pledged, and how much they hold
What if I invest in RTNINDIA?
Set a growth rate and see what a monthly SIP would add up to. Your assumption, our arithmetic.
The starting rate is a round number, not a view on this company — this is your assumption, and the figure above is arithmetic on it. Returns are not steady year to year, and a real holding would not grow in a straight line. We do not publish price targets or predict returns.
P/E, ROE, ROCE and margins are annualised from the latest quarter; per-share and balance-sheet ratios use the most recent balance sheet on file · prices as of 2026-11-04.
An educational model from the company's own filings, every assumption shown — not investment advice or a price target. Prices can stay above or below any model for years.
| Revenue from Operations | ₹2,062 cr |
| Other Income | ₹2 cr |
| Total Income | ₹2,064 cr |
| Cost of Materials | ₹54 cr |
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | ₹1,810 cr |
| Inventory Change (±) | ₹-231 cr |
| Employee Benefit Expense | ₹40 cr |
| Finance Costs | ₹21 cr |
| Depreciation & Amortisation | ₹3 cr |
| Other Expenses | ₹36 cr |
| Total Expenses | ₹2,094 cr |
| Profit before Tax | ₹-30 cr |
| Tax Expense | ₹2 cr |
| Share of JV / Associates | ₹8 cr |
| Net Profit | ₹-24 cr |
| Net margin on total income | -1.2% |
The company made a net loss of ₹24 cr this quarter — income covered only ₹98 of every ₹100 it spent on costs and tax.
| Metric | Q4 FY26 | Q1 FY27 | Q2 FY27 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,697 cr | 1,870 cr | 2,062 cr |
| Total income | 1,698 cr | 1,871 cr | 2,064 cr |
| Expenses | 1,822 cr | 1,852 cr | 2,094 cr |
| Profit before tax | -123 cr | 19 cr | -30 cr |
| Tax | -13 cr | 13 cr | 2 cr |
| Net profit (owners' share) | -110 cr | 15 cr | -24 cr |
| Net margin (owners' share, on revenue) | -6.5% | 0.8% | -1.2% |
| EPS (₹) | -0.80 | 0.11 | -0.18 |
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E | ROE | Net margin | 1-yr return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETERNAL LIMITED | ₹349 | ₹3.22 L cr | 624.0 | 1.6% | 0.5% | — |
| Meesho Limited | ₹223 | ₹1.03 L cr | — | -12.6% | -3.2% | — |
| FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited | ₹354 | ₹1.01 L cr | 316.0 | 22.3% | 2.9% | — |
| Swiggy Limited | ₹177 | ₹46,301 cr | — | -21.7% | -12.2% | — |
| Urban Company Limited | ₹159 | ₹23,639 cr | — | -36.9% | -34.0% | — |
| Cartrade Tech Limited | ₹2,498 | ₹12,146 cr | 50.8 | 9.0% | 27.9% | — |
| Brainbees Solutions Limited | ₹163 | ₹7,916 cr | — | -2.6% | -1.5% | — |
| Rentomojo Limited | ₹549 | ₹5,510 cr | 175.8 | — | 6.2% | — |
| RattanIndia Enterprises Limitedthis company | ₹25 | ₹3,449 cr | — | -12.8% | -1.2% | — |
A company cannot decide everything on its own. Things like a top executive’s pay, issuing new shares, or re-appointing a director have to be put to the people who own the company, and they vote — one vote per share. So whoever owns the most shares has the most say.
Every vote count above is taken from the result the company filed with the stock exchange, certified by an independent counter. To work out what would have happened without the promoters, we simply remove their votes and re-apply the same legal bar the proposal had to clear. Nothing here is an estimate or an opinion.
Most Indian companies are controlled by a family or group — the promoters. The exchange requires them to be listed by name, including members who own no shares at all, and requires the company to disclose any business it does with them.
Names and holdings from the company’s shareholding pattern filed with the exchange; transactions from the related-party note in its annual report. Every figure is as filed — these are legal, disclosed dealings, and what to make of them is your call.